One area that people often overlook is the use of mediation as a valuable form of conflict resolution. When faced with a lawsuit, dispute, argument, or contract issue with another party, the immediate response may be to file a lawsuit and let the court battle it out, leaving the decision to a judge or jury. However, professionals knowledgeable about disputes understand that this approach is not ideal. Even attorneys, who may benefit from billable hours and increased income through court proceedings, generally do not prefer going to court. If you were to ask any attorney, they would likely express their aversion to court battles.
To underscore this point, consider an advertisement found on Instagram for a legal system targeting attorneys. The advertisement promises attorneys an escape from the courtroom, the opportunity to avoid heart-wrenching cases, and the chance to attract profitable and trusting clients within just six months. These companies recognize that attorneys seek alternatives to litigation because it ultimately fails to benefit anyone involved. Not only does it yield less favorable results, but it also incurs significant expenses. Court fees, along with thousands or even tens of thousands of dollars paid to attorneys, contribute to exorbitant costs. For instance, even a seemingly minor civil litigation case involving a ten or fifteen thousand dollar dispute can easily accumulate legal fees of up to one hundred thousand dollars for each party. It is an impractical and financially burdensome approach that neither attorneys nor their clients appreciate.
One might assume that attorneys should vigorously fight for their clients in court, but they understand that litigation often does more harm than good. Consequently, companies have emerged, offering attorneys an outlet to avoid litigation altogether. This demonstrates a growing recognition that court battles are counterproductive and emotionally draining.
In certain jurisdictions, mediation is mandatory for specific areas of law. For example, in North Carolina, mediation has become customary and is required before a case proceeds to court. This requirement aims to save both litigants and courts valuable time, considering that court dockets are often backlogged, resulting in lengthy and drawn-out legal proceedings.
Nevertheless, numerous misconceptions surround mediation. One common misconception is that the mediator will dictate what must be done. In reality, the mediator’s role is to facilitate a resolution. Participants in mediation maintain control over the outcome and have the freedom to withdraw from the process if they disagree with the suggestions or offers made by the mediator. Attorneys often refer to mediation as the “last chance to control your own destiny,” emphasizing the importance of retaining autonomy over the resolution.
While attorneys are indeed capable of negotiating settlements, their role is primarily to advocate for their clients. They cannot be neutral mediators who listen to both sides of the dispute. In many instances, parties involved simply desire the opportunity to be heard. When individuals express a desire for their day in court, it is not because they relish the experience of going to the courthouse, enduring security checks, and waiting in stark lobby areas. Rather, they seek an opportunity to voice their grievances and demonstrate to the world what the other party did wrong. Mediation can provide this avenue for expression, ensuring that the parties’ concerns are acknowledged.
Privacy is often cited as a significant advantage of mediation. Unlike court proceedings, which are public record, mediation sessions are confidential. Behind closed doors, participants can air their grievances and discuss sensitive matters without fear of public exposure. However, the true value of mediation lies in its ability to allow individuals to assess their risks objectively. Litigants may firmly believe they are in the right, but even with strong evidence and moral conviction, going to court still carries risks. Winning a case does not guarantee that other forms of damage—repetitional harm, evidentiary complications, time-consuming procedures, and heightened stress—will be avoided. A seasoned mediator, having dealt with numerous disputes and court cases, understands the hidden pitfalls and risks associated with litigation. While attorneys may possess this knowledge as well, their advice often goes unheeded. Mediation provides litigants with an opportunity to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the risks involved in going to court, allowing them to make informed decisions rather than blind leaps of faith.
Mediation also serves as an outlet for individuals in emotionally charged conflicts. Lawsuits frequently stem from tragic circumstances, accompanied by grief, anger, and feelings of helplessness. While it is understandable to want to express these emotions, it is crucial to differentiate the court system from therapy or counseling. Venting emotions during a court case only escalates costs and exacerbates emotional distress. Mediation offers a neutral space where parties can address their conflicts without direct confrontation, enabling the mediator to help separate the emotional aspects from the core issues at hand.
Drawing a parallel to real estate transactions, the involvement of realtors serves as a buffer, ensuring that personal conflicts and emotions do not hinder negotiations. This separation of personalities minimizes animosity and allows for smoother communication and deal-making. Similarly, a mediator acts as a neutral facilitator, reducing animosity between conflicting parties and creating an environment conducive to resolving disputes.
In conclusion, mediation should not be overlooked as a highly effective alternative to resolving conflicts. It offers numerous advantages, including a fresh perspective, privacy, risk assessment, the opportunity to be heard, and reduced animosity between parties. Rather than succumbing to the allure of court battles, it is essential to consider mediation as a valuable tool in achieving mutually beneficial resolutions. By embracing mediation, individuals can save time, money, and emotional turmoil while actively participating in shaping their own outcomes.
If you are looking for mediation guidance. We are here to help you. Please click here and schedule an appointment with us.
Leave a Reply